Ukraine’s withdrawal from the city of Avdiivka hands Vladimir Putin a major symbolic victory before Russia’s presidential election in March and exposes Kyiv’s critical shortages of weapons and soldiers.
Avdiivka, a small industrial city in the eastern Donbas region, has been a symbol of Ukrainian resistance to Russian aggression since 2014.
It is close to the city of Donetsk, which pro-Russian separatists control as their capital and whose Moscow-backed fighters briefly took power in July 2014 before Ukrainian forces regained control.
The city is now mostly destroyed and abandoned, with the vast majority of its pre-war population of around 34,000 having fled.
Avdiivka “has been a symbol of Ukraine’s battlefield resolve and Russia’s military failures”, said analyst Ivan Klyszcz of the Estonia-based International Centre for Defence and Security.
But it is “strategically insignificant”, added Gustav Gressel, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
“It would have been a good foot in the door for a Ukrainian offensive” on Donetsk city, but Ukraine cannot conduct such an offensive for at least two years and it made “no sense to sacrifice soldiers now”, he said.
For Vladimir Putin, whose re-election as Russian president in March is all but assured with the opposition muzzled or exiled, Avdiivka is a “significant victory”, according to the US-based Institute for the Study of War.
A spokesman for one of Ukraine’s top military units said the months-long battle for Avdiivka was even tougher than the bloody fighting in Bakhmut, another industrial eastern city which Russian paramilitary group Wagner claimed to have captured in May 2023.
Oleksandr Borodin of Ukraine’s third assault brigade pointed to Russia’s massive deployment of heavy equipment and air power, with intense bombardment raining down on Ukrainian positions in recent days.
Russia carried out tank attacks with infantry using “a large number” of armoured personnel carriers, Soviet-era combat vehicles, planes and drones, whereas Wagner mostly sent men into the Bakhmut front line, he said before Ukraine’s withdrawal.
Although Avdiivka’s defences had been strengthened since 2014 and inflicted heavy losses since October, Russian forces managed to “infiltrate into the city itself” in mid-January, said Gressel.
In the past two weeks, Ukrainian communication lines were cut or endangered, while some areas faced attacks from all sides, he added.
The delivery of Western F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine “take much too long” and Kyiv’s forces were running short of air-to-air missiles and artillery ammunition, undermining the defence of Avdiivka, Gressel said.
Pulling out of Avdiivka was the right decision to avoid being surrounded and save as many lives as possible, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told the Munich Security Conference on Saturday.
“This does not mean that people retreated some kilometres and Russia captured something, it did not capture anything,” he added.
The retreat is unsurprising because Russia had nearly surrounded Avdiivka and the destruction of units would have been “catastrophic” for Ukraine, said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
“The corridor leading out of the city is narrow and under fire. The retreat will not be easy,” he warned.
Ukrainian forces have been ordered to set up new defensive lines to the west and southwest of Avdiivka and the battle is far from over.
It remains to be seen whether Ukraine can defend the new line and if Russia has enough reserves to continue the offensive and make another breakthrough, said Philippe Gros of the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris.
According to a European military source, Ukraine is going on the defensive to hold out in the long term, fend off local Russian attacks and avoid squandering its capacities while waiting for fresh Western aid, especially from the United States.
