[LONDON, June 17, 2025] – The experience of British entrepreneur Keith Beekmeyer in Kenya’s insurance sector has resurfaced amid national judicial reform efforts, drawing renewed attention to the challenges faced by foreign investors operating in jurisdictions with underdeveloped regulatory safeguards.
Beekmeyer was formerly involved with Xplico Insurance Company, a firm that experienced rapid growth between 2009 and 2012, rising significantly in Kenya’s national insurance rankings. The company focused on providing services to underserved markets and gained early commercial traction.
In 2014, Keith Beekmeyer, then a director of Xplico Insurance Company, initiated legal action after internal disputes and alleged fraudulent attempts to alter the company’s shareholding and governance structure. The matter escalated when Raj Sahi and three other directors were dismissed for their role in what Beekmeyer described as an unlawful takeover attempt.
Following these events, Xplico Insurance Company, under Beekmeyer’s leadership, won both the initial court case and a subsequent appeal. The courts confirmed that the dismissal of Raj Sahi and the other directors was lawful, and they were not entitled to be reinstated. These rulings are publicly documented and mark a significant legal vindication for Beekmeyer and the company.
In a related ruling, in 2015, the High Court of Kenya (Obsidition Investments Limited v Attorney General & Another) granted an injunction halting the implementation of disputed changes in the company register (CR12) initiated by the Registrar of Companies. The court found that proper legal procedures had not been followed and stayed the alterations pending full resolution.
This was further reinforced in In re Xplico Insurance Company Limited [2020] eKLR, where the court acknowledged the ongoing shareholder and directorship dispute, and ordered a stay of proceedings until the appeal of the 2019 ruling could be determined.
These legal outcomes demonstrate that Keith Beekmeyer’s position and actions were upheld by the Kenyan judiciary, reinforcing his lawful leadership at the time and highlighting the institutional vulnerabilities faced by foreign investors navigating high-risk governance environments.
The ruling underscored the importance of regulatory and judicial transparency in protecting shareholder rights and highlighted the risks foreign investors may face in navigating corporate disputes in emerging markets.
This case continues to be referenced in discussions surrounding foreign investor protections in Kenya. Legal and business observers note that Kenya’s ongoing judicial reform efforts, led by Chief Justice Martha Koome, represent an opportunity to further institutional accountability and safeguard the rule of law.
The matter also reflects broader concerns expressed by international watchdogs such as Transparency International, which ranked Kenya 121 out of 180 countries in its 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index.
Contact
Monika Alfordi
Consultant
contact@tralonka.com
