‘Make America Healthy Again’ Report Cites Nonexistent Studies: Authors

At least four of the studies cited in a flagship White House report on children’s health do not exist, authors listed in the document told AFP Thursday, casting doubt on the paper outlining US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s agenda.

The highly anticipated “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) report was released on May 22 by the presidential commission tasked with assessing drivers of childhood chronic disease.

But it includes broken citation links and credits authors with papers they say they did not write.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the mishaps as “formatting issues” during a press briefing Thursday and said the report will be updated to address them.

“It does not negate the substance of the report,” said Leavitt, who expressed confidence in Kennedy and his team, and insisted that their work was “backed on good science.”

The errors were first reported Thursday by NOTUS, a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute.

Noah Kreski, a Columbia University researcher listed as an author of a paper on adolescent anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic, told AFP the citation is “not one of our studies” and “doesn’t appear to be a study that exists at all.”

The citation includes a link that purports to send users to an article in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA, but which is broken.

Jim Michalski, a spokesman for JAMA Network, said it “was not published in JAMA Pediatrics or in any JAMA Network journal.”

Columbia University epidemiologist Katherine Keyes, who was also listed as an author of the supposed JAMA study, told AFP she does research on the topic but does not know where the statistics credited to her came from, and that she “did not write that paper.”

“I would be happy to send this information to the MAHA committee to correct the report, although I have not yet received information on where to reach them.”

Guohua Li, another Columbia University professor apparently named in the citation, said the reference is “totally fabricated” and that he does not even know Kreski.

AFP also spoke with Harold Farber, pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, who said the paper attributed to him “does not exist” nor had he ever collaborated with the co-authors credited in the MAHA report.

Similarly, Brian McNeill, spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, confirmed that professor Robert Findling did not author a paper the report says he wrote about advertising of psychotropic medications for youth.

A fourth paper on ADHD medication was also not published in the journal Pediatrics in 2008 as claimed in the MAHA report, according to Alex Hulvalchick, media relations specialist for the journal’s publisher, the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declined to comment, referring AFP’s questions to the White House.

At her briefing, Leavitt declined to answer how the report was produced and whether artificial intelligence tools may have been used to craft it, directing those questions back to HHS.

The Democratic National Committee blasted the report as “rife with misinformation” in a Thursday press release, saying Kennedy’s agency “is justifying its policy priorities with studies and sources that do not exist.”

Kennedy was approved as health secretary earlier this year despite widespread alarm from the medical community over his history of promoting vaccine misinformation and denying scientific facts.

Since taking office, he has ordered the National Institutes of Health to probe the causes of autism — a condition he has long falsely tied to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The report’s chronic disease references appear to nod to that same disproven theory, discredited by numerous studies since the idea first aired in a late 1990s paper based on falsified data.

It also criticizes the “over-medicalization” of children, citing surging prescriptions of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics, and blaming “corporate capture” for skewing scientific research.